Parental hesitancy poses a serious threat to the success of the COVID-19 childhood vaccination campaign. We investigate whether adults' opinions on childhood vaccination can be influenced via two survey experiments in Italy (n = 3,633 participants) and the UK (n = 3,314 participants). Respondents were randomly assigned to: a “risk treatment” that highlighted the potential risks of COVID-19 to a child, a “herd immunity treatment” that emphasized the community benefits of pediatric vaccination, or a control message. Participants’ probability of supporting COVID-19 childhood vaccination was then assessed on a 0–100 scale. We find that the “risk treatment” reduced the proportion of Italian parents strongly against vaccination by up to 29.6 %, while increasing the proportion of neutral parents by up to 45.0 %. The “herd immunity treatment”, instead, was only effective among non-parents, resulting in a lower proportion of individuals against pediatric vaccination and a higher proportion of individuals in favor (both shifted by around 20 %).

Chiavenna, C., Leone, L., Melegaro, A., Rotesi, T., Bokemper, S., Paintsil, E., et al. (2023). Personal risk or societal benefit? Investigating adults’ support for COVID-19 childhood vaccination. VACCINE, 41(25), 3683-3687 [10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.017].

Personal risk or societal benefit? Investigating adults’ support for COVID-19 childhood vaccination

Chiavenna C.;
2023

Abstract

Parental hesitancy poses a serious threat to the success of the COVID-19 childhood vaccination campaign. We investigate whether adults' opinions on childhood vaccination can be influenced via two survey experiments in Italy (n = 3,633 participants) and the UK (n = 3,314 participants). Respondents were randomly assigned to: a “risk treatment” that highlighted the potential risks of COVID-19 to a child, a “herd immunity treatment” that emphasized the community benefits of pediatric vaccination, or a control message. Participants’ probability of supporting COVID-19 childhood vaccination was then assessed on a 0–100 scale. We find that the “risk treatment” reduced the proportion of Italian parents strongly against vaccination by up to 29.6 %, while increasing the proportion of neutral parents by up to 45.0 %. The “herd immunity treatment”, instead, was only effective among non-parents, resulting in a lower proportion of individuals against pediatric vaccination and a higher proportion of individuals in favor (both shifted by around 20 %).
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Children; COVID-19; Health information; Parents; Vaccine hesitancy;
English
9-mag-2023
2023
41
25
3683
3687
open
Chiavenna, C., Leone, L., Melegaro, A., Rotesi, T., Bokemper, S., Paintsil, E., et al. (2023). Personal risk or societal benefit? Investigating adults’ support for COVID-19 childhood vaccination. VACCINE, 41(25), 3683-3687 [10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.017].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Chiavenna et al-2023-Vaccine-VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 1.14 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.14 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/629188
Citazioni
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
Social impact