Sharenting includes a range of parental practices, from those who carefully manage their children’s digital presence to protect privacy, to others who seek to monetize their children’s images. While some parents limit access through privacy settings or anti-sharenting behaviors, others deliberately seek public visibility to attract brand collaborations. This chapter examines these contrasting practices through two digital ethnography case studies. The first explores everyday parental dilemmas through discussions in a parenting forum, revealing how mothers negotiate boundaries, gatekeep their children’s digital footprints, and manage conflicts with relatives and school personnel. The second analyzes Instagram accounts where parents employ practices such as follow loops, engagement pods, and baby brand rep programs to build audiences and pursue commercial opportunities. Together, these findings illustrate how sharenting can function as both a mundane, relational activity and a commodification of childhood, raising important ethical questions about children’s privacy and their digital representation in digital spaces.

Cino, D., Ruiz-Gomez, A. (2026). Sharenting as a multifaceted digital practice: Comparing privacy considerations based on parental motivations. In G.F. Lendvai (a cura di), Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Sharenting: Parenting, Privacy, and Consent (pp. 3-16). Taylor and Francis [10.4324/9781003633495-2].

Sharenting as a multifaceted digital practice: Comparing privacy considerations based on parental motivations

Cino D.;
2026

Abstract

Sharenting includes a range of parental practices, from those who carefully manage their children’s digital presence to protect privacy, to others who seek to monetize their children’s images. While some parents limit access through privacy settings or anti-sharenting behaviors, others deliberately seek public visibility to attract brand collaborations. This chapter examines these contrasting practices through two digital ethnography case studies. The first explores everyday parental dilemmas through discussions in a parenting forum, revealing how mothers negotiate boundaries, gatekeep their children’s digital footprints, and manage conflicts with relatives and school personnel. The second analyzes Instagram accounts where parents employ practices such as follow loops, engagement pods, and baby brand rep programs to build audiences and pursue commercial opportunities. Together, these findings illustrate how sharenting can function as both a mundane, relational activity and a commodification of childhood, raising important ethical questions about children’s privacy and their digital representation in digital spaces.
Capitolo o saggio
sharenting; privacy; digital parenting; digital dilemmas; baby brand
English
Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Sharenting: Parenting, Privacy, and Consent
Lendvai, GF, Vizcaíno-Verdú, A, Velicu, A, Koltay, A
2026
9781003633495
Taylor and Francis
3
16
Cino, D., Ruiz-Gomez, A. (2026). Sharenting as a multifaceted digital practice: Comparing privacy considerations based on parental motivations. In G.F. Lendvai (a cura di), Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Sharenting: Parenting, Privacy, and Consent (pp. 3-16). Taylor and Francis [10.4324/9781003633495-2].
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/606522
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact