Background: With rising global aging, healthcare systems face challenges from multimorbidity, functional decline, and cognitive impairment. Multidomain interventions offer a promising approach to promoting healthy aging. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of multidomain interventions (≥3 domains) on motor-functional, cognitive, and psychological outcomes in older adults without moderate/severe dementia. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and Embase were searched up to April 30, 2024. Eligible studies included clinical trials or observational studies involving adults ≥60 years receiving multidomain interventions versus control/standard care. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: Thirty-eight studies (57 comparisons) were included (median age: 75.3 intervention, 75.1 control; >60% female). Intervention lasted 2-36 months (median 6.0). All studies targeted the physical domain, 78.9% cognitive, 81.6% nutritional, and 84.2% additional domains. Motor-functional outcomes improved significantly (e.g., Short Physical Performance Battery: SMD = 0.40, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.66; Cardiovascular Health Study frailty criteria: SMD = -0.14, 95% CI -0.23 to -0.05), with diminishing effects over time. Other indicators (e.g., handgrip strength), showed modest improvements. Cognitive improvements were limited to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; SMD = 0.23, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.40). Psychological benefits included reduced depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale: SMD = -0.35, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.12). Effect estimates for Timed Up and Go and RBANS were attenuated in sensitivity analysis excluding high-risk-of-bias studies. Conclusions: Multidomain interventions improve motor-functional and psychological well-being. Moderate cognitive benefits are observed primarily using the MoCA. These findings support large-scale implementation in geriatric care and highlight the need for strategies to sustain long-term effectiveness.
Pagan, E., Okoye, C., Cuffaro, L., Ornago, A., Finazzi, A., Pozzi, F., et al. (2026). Effects of multidomain interventions on health outcomes in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. THE JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, HEALTH & AGING, 30(6) [10.1016/j.jnha.2026.100865].
Effects of multidomain interventions on health outcomes in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Pagan, Eleonora
Co-primo
;Okoye, ChukwumaCo-primo
;Cuffaro, Luca;Ornago, Alice Margherita;Finazzi, Alberto;Pozzi, Federico Emanuele;Ferrara, Maria Cristina;Sala, Gessica;Zambon, Antonella;Ferrarese, CarloCo-ultimo
;Bellelli, GiuseppeCo-ultimo
2026
Abstract
Background: With rising global aging, healthcare systems face challenges from multimorbidity, functional decline, and cognitive impairment. Multidomain interventions offer a promising approach to promoting healthy aging. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of multidomain interventions (≥3 domains) on motor-functional, cognitive, and psychological outcomes in older adults without moderate/severe dementia. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and Embase were searched up to April 30, 2024. Eligible studies included clinical trials or observational studies involving adults ≥60 years receiving multidomain interventions versus control/standard care. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: Thirty-eight studies (57 comparisons) were included (median age: 75.3 intervention, 75.1 control; >60% female). Intervention lasted 2-36 months (median 6.0). All studies targeted the physical domain, 78.9% cognitive, 81.6% nutritional, and 84.2% additional domains. Motor-functional outcomes improved significantly (e.g., Short Physical Performance Battery: SMD = 0.40, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.66; Cardiovascular Health Study frailty criteria: SMD = -0.14, 95% CI -0.23 to -0.05), with diminishing effects over time. Other indicators (e.g., handgrip strength), showed modest improvements. Cognitive improvements were limited to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; SMD = 0.23, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.40). Psychological benefits included reduced depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale: SMD = -0.35, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.12). Effect estimates for Timed Up and Go and RBANS were attenuated in sensitivity analysis excluding high-risk-of-bias studies. Conclusions: Multidomain interventions improve motor-functional and psychological well-being. Moderate cognitive benefits are observed primarily using the MoCA. These findings support large-scale implementation in geriatric care and highlight the need for strategies to sustain long-term effectiveness.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pagan et al-2026-The Journal of nutrition, health and aging-VoR.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza:
Creative Commons
Dimensione
1.62 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.62 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


