The Chat-With-Cat project focuses on the development of intelligent tutoring systems to support the learning and teaching of argumentation. The AI tutor provides feedback on argumentative essays written by students in response to controversial questions. The project is grounded in a theoretical and pedagogical framework that integrates the Argumentation Rating Tool (Reznitskaya & Wilkinson, 2017, 2021), Philosophy for Children (Gregory, 2007; Oyler, 2019), the Socratic Challenge (Flammia, 2023), and the Rational Force Model (Næss, 1959), which defines the rational force of a proposition as the product of its acceptability and relevance. The Rational Force Model addresses key limitations of classical structural analysis approaches inspired by Toulmin (1958), which have been criticized for their limited diagnostic power (Chinn et al., 2016; Erduran, 2018). In our project, students’ arguments are analyzed through logical chains of propositions, each classified as present, assumed, or absent. Preliminary results indicate high agreement among human raters and suggest strong potential for automated assessment.

Flammia, M. (2025). AI and Classroom Argumentation: The Chat-With-Cat Project. Intervento presentato a: Workshop on educational dialogue: Moving thinking forward Cambridge, 1st-3rd September 2025, Cambridge University, UK.

AI and Classroom Argumentation: The Chat-With-Cat Project

Flammia, M
2025

Abstract

The Chat-With-Cat project focuses on the development of intelligent tutoring systems to support the learning and teaching of argumentation. The AI tutor provides feedback on argumentative essays written by students in response to controversial questions. The project is grounded in a theoretical and pedagogical framework that integrates the Argumentation Rating Tool (Reznitskaya & Wilkinson, 2017, 2021), Philosophy for Children (Gregory, 2007; Oyler, 2019), the Socratic Challenge (Flammia, 2023), and the Rational Force Model (Næss, 1959), which defines the rational force of a proposition as the product of its acceptability and relevance. The Rational Force Model addresses key limitations of classical structural analysis approaches inspired by Toulmin (1958), which have been criticized for their limited diagnostic power (Chinn et al., 2016; Erduran, 2018). In our project, students’ arguments are analyzed through logical chains of propositions, each classified as present, assumed, or absent. Preliminary results indicate high agreement among human raters and suggest strong potential for automated assessment.
abstract + slide
Argumentation; Dialogic Teaching; Formative Assessment; Assessment of Argumentative Writing; Artificial Intelligence in Education
English
Workshop on educational dialogue: Moving thinking forward Cambridge, 1st-3rd September 2025
2025
2025
reserved
Flammia, M. (2025). AI and Classroom Argumentation: The Chat-With-Cat Project. Intervento presentato a: Workshop on educational dialogue: Moving thinking forward Cambridge, 1st-3rd September 2025, Cambridge University, UK.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Flammia-2025-Workshop on educational dialogue.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Presentation Slides
Tipologia di allegato: Other attachments
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 1.46 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.46 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/566601
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact