Digital health interventions (DHIs) show promise for the treatment of mental health disorders. However, existing meta-analytical research is methodologically heterogeneous, with studies including a mix of clinical, non-clinical, and transdiagnostic populations, hindering a comprehensive understanding of DHI effectiveness. Thus, we conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of DHIs for specific mental health disorders and evaluating the quality of evidence. We searched three public electronic databases from inception to February, 2024 and included 16 studies. DHIs were effective compared with active interventions for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder, and panic disorder. Notable treatment effects compared with a waiting list were also observed for specific phobias, generalised anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and bulimia nervosa. Certainty of evidence was rated as very low or low in most cases, except for generalised anxiety disorder-related outcomes, which showed a moderate rating. To integrate DHIs into clinical practice, further high-quality studies with clearly defined target populations and robust comparators are needed.
Crocamo, C., Palpella, D., Cavaleri, D., Nasti, C., Piacenti, S., Morello, P., et al. (2025). Digital health interventions for mental health disorders: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. THE LANCET. DIGITAL HEALTH, 7(8) [10.1016/j.landig.2025.100878].
Digital health interventions for mental health disorders: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
Crocamo, Cristina;Palpella, Dario;Cavaleri, Daniele;Nasti, Christian;Piacenti, Susanna;Morello, Pietro;Villa, Oliviero;Riboldi, Ilaria;Bartoli, Francesco;Carrà, Giuseppe
2025
Abstract
Digital health interventions (DHIs) show promise for the treatment of mental health disorders. However, existing meta-analytical research is methodologically heterogeneous, with studies including a mix of clinical, non-clinical, and transdiagnostic populations, hindering a comprehensive understanding of DHI effectiveness. Thus, we conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of DHIs for specific mental health disorders and evaluating the quality of evidence. We searched three public electronic databases from inception to February, 2024 and included 16 studies. DHIs were effective compared with active interventions for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder, and panic disorder. Notable treatment effects compared with a waiting list were also observed for specific phobias, generalised anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and bulimia nervosa. Certainty of evidence was rated as very low or low in most cases, except for generalised anxiety disorder-related outcomes, which showed a moderate rating. To integrate DHIs into clinical practice, further high-quality studies with clearly defined target populations and robust comparators are needed.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Crocamo et al-2025-The Lancet Digital Health-VoR.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: User License: Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza:
Creative Commons
Dimensione
395.96 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
395.96 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


